[Youth-list] High Costs of Child Poverty
JMRab at aol.com
JMRab at aol.com
Wed Jan 24 22:47:57 PST 2007
The Economic Costs of Child Poverty
Testimony Before the U.S. House Committee on Ways and Means
Author(s): _Harry Holzer_ (http://www.urban.org/HarryHolzer)
(http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=901032&renderforprint=1)
Posted to Web: January 24, 2007
Permanent Link: http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=901032
The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on
timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of
the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees,
or its funders.
Harry Holzer is a Visiting Fellow at the Urban Institute and a Professor of
Public Policy and Associate Dean at Georgetown Public Policy Institute.
____________________________________
Abstract
In testimony before the U.S. House Ways and Means Committee, visiting fellow
Harry Holzer says the costs to the United States associated with childhood
poverty total about $500 billion per year, or the equivalent of nearly 4
percent of GDP. This suggests that investing significant resources in poverty
reduction might be more cost-effective than previously thought.
____________________________________
Testimony
Mr. Chairman,
Thank you for inviting me to speak today on the economic costs of poverty to
the United States.
I'd like to share with all of you some recent findings of a paper I
coauthored with several colleagues for the Task Force on Poverty of the Center for
American Progress. The paper attempts to estimate the economic costs of child
poverty in the United States.
Most arguments for reducing poverty in the United States, especially among
children, rest on a moral case for doing so—one that emphasizes the unfairness
of child poverty and how it runs counter to our national creed of equal
opportunity for all.
But there is also an economic case for reducing child poverty. When children
grow up in poverty, they are more likely as adults to have low earnings,
which in turn reflect low productivity in the workforce. They are also more
likely to engage in crime and to have poor health later in life. Their reduced
productive activity generates a direct loss of goods and services to the U.S.
economy. Any crime in which they engage imposes large monetary and other
personal costs on their victims and on the taxpayer of administering our huge
criminal justice system. And their poor health generates illness and early
mortality that requires large health care expenditures, impedes productivity, and
ultimately reduces their quality and quantity of life.
In each case, we reviewed a range of rigorous research studies that estimate
the average statistical relationships between growing up in poverty, on the
one hand, and one's earnings, propensity to commit crime, and quality of
health later in life, on the other. We also reviewed estimates of the costs that
crime and poor health per person impose on the economy. Then we aggregated
all of these average costs per poor child across the total number of children
growing up in poverty in the United States to estimate the aggregate costs of
child poverty to the U.S. economy. We had to make a number of critical
assumptions about how to define and measure poverty, what level of income to use as
a non-poverty benchmark, and which effects are really caused by growing up
in poverty and not simply correlated with it. Wherever possible, we made
conservative assumptions, in order to generate lower-bound estimates.
Our results suggest that the costs to the United States associated with
childhood poverty total about $500 billion per year, or the equivalent of nearly
4 percent of GDP. More specifically, we estimate that childhood poverty each
year:
* Reduces productivity and economic output by about 1.3 percent of
GDP;
* Raises the costs of crime by 1.3 percent of GDP; and
* Raises health expenditures and reduces the value of health by 1.2
percent of GDP.
If anything, these estimates almost certainly understate the true costs of
poverty to the U.S. economy. For one thing, they omit the costs associated
with poor adults who did not grow up poor as children. They ignore all other
costs that poverty might impose on the nation besides those associated with low
productivity, crime, and health—such as environmental costs and much of the
suffering of the poor themselves.
What does all of this imply for public policy? The high cost of childhood
poverty to the United States suggests that investing significant resources in
poverty reduction might be more cost-effective over time than we previously
thought. Of course, determining the effectiveness of various policies requires
careful evaluation research in a variety of areas. But a range of policies—
such as universal pre-kindergarten (or pre-K) programs, various school reform
efforts, expansions of the earned income tax credit (EITC) and other income
supports for the working poor, job training for poor adults, higher minimum
wages and more collective bargaining, low-income neighborhood revitalization and
housing mobility, marriage promotion, and faith-based initiatives—might all
be potentially involved in this effort. Given the strong evidence that
already exists on some of these efforts (like high-quality pre-K and the EITC),
some investments through these mechanisms seem particularly warranted.
At a minimum, the costs of poverty imply that we should work hard to
identify cost-effective strategies of poverty remediation, and we should not
hesitate to invest significant resources when these strategies are identified. In
the meantime, we should also experiment with and evaluate a wide range of
promising efforts.
The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to
the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.
Janice M. Gruendel, Ph.D.
Governor's Senior Advisor on Early Childhood
Co-Chair, CT Early Childhood Education Cabinet
Senior Youth Consultant
United Way of CT & Office for Workforce Competitiveness
Home office: 203-481-9940
Blackberry: 203-824-4766
Mail to: 28 Juniper Point
Branford, CT 06405
"...I hope you never fear those mountains in the distance, Never settle for
the path of least resistance..And when you get a chance to sit it out or
dance, I hope you dance..." Lee Ann Womack. I Hope You'll Dance
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ctvoices.org/pipermail/youth-list-ctvoices.org/attachments/20070125/dd7d376d/attachment.html
More information about the youth-list
mailing list